jrtom: (Default)
[personal profile] jrtom
http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm

Some of these I didn't realize were 'censored' (e.g. net neutrality). Apparently I read things that cover them anyway.

(So why is this 2007's list already? Is it kind of like the fact that the 2008 cars will be coming out in August?)

(no subject)

Date: 1 June 2007 01:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zandperl.livejournal.com
If you look at the dates on the articles, you will note that they are from June 1 2005 - May 31 2006. I presume the 2007 year refers to the year in which they were selected.

(no subject)

Date: 1 June 2007 20:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrtom.livejournal.com
Yes, I did notice the article dates (or at least noticed that the ones I saw were from 2005/6)--although some of the follow-ups are a bit later, I think.

I do think that "Top 25 Censored Stories of 2007" is at the least confusing, however. When we're talking about news stories, I assume that "of 2007" means "actually taking place in 2007" (or, more to the point, "actively censored in 2007") rather than "selected in 2007". Obviously there has to be some lead time--how can you tell that a story was 'censored' if you don't wait a while after the initial events/coverage to see whether it spreads?--but titling this list in this way could lead to loss of credibility if any of these topics _do_ get wide coverage in 2007. ("Whaddaya mean, 'censored stories of 2007'--it's right there in the Noo Yawk Times front page in Septemba, innit?")

So, yeah, bad title, IMO. :)

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 29 December 2025 03:11
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios