http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1020/p02s01-stss.html
Haven't managed to find any other news articles on this. The claims made seem to be rather extravagant; anyone know anything about this?
Haven't managed to find any other news articles on this. The claims made seem to be rather extravagant; anyone know anything about this?
(no subject)
Date: 20 October 2006 16:07 (UTC)I saw this on LiveScience:
http://www.livescience.com/technology/061019_invisibility_cloak.html
I'm certainly not qualified to comment on the physics involved.
(no subject)
Date: 20 October 2006 16:12 (UTC)And this AP story at wired.com
http://www.wired.com/news/wireservice/0,71972-0.html?tw=wn_index_9
(no subject)
Date: 20 October 2006 16:14 (UTC)BS factor - high
Date: 20 October 2006 19:17 (UTC)"unlike normal matter?"
Then they finally come clean and admit that it's a clever antenna that redirects microwaves.
That's not unlike normal matter, that's a simple machine.