Sail

Date: 18 December 2007 23:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fdmts.livejournal.com
That was the sound of my head hitting my desk.

Again and again and again.

Re: Sail

Date: 18 December 2007 23:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrtom.livejournal.com
Due, I hope, to the immense silliness of the fact that we're in a position of rediscovering sail technology, rather than that I missed something that makes this all much less plausible or obviously advantageous.

Re: Sail

Date: 19 December 2007 01:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madeoutofpeople.livejournal.com
As far as I can tell, it's a little different than classic sail technology. Classic sails were rigid masts sticking out of the deck, and waiting for favorable wind to blow in your direction using basic drag principles. More recent sails (as of the 17th century, I think) were rigid masts sticking out of the deck, plus a deep keel, that could take advantage of winds in about 180 degrees of spectrum by using aerodynamics.

This is getting pulled by a really frickin' big kite 1000 feet up. The wind 1000 feet up is steady, and not very gusty, but it's a very different technology.

That said, it's not clear to me why sailboat-style masts aren't being installed on really big hulls.

Re: Sail

Date: 19 December 2007 04:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fdmts.livejournal.com
I just can't believe that a 20% fuel economy savings from SAILS has been sitting there for the past 100 years and nobody noticed.

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 27 December 2025 23:20
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios