![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.scientificblogging.com/carl_wieman/optimizing_science_education_what_we_will_need_for_the_university_of_2020
As soon as I saw the phrases "educational designers" and--even better!--"effortful constructors", I thought to myself, "You know, there may actually be some good ideas in here, but they're going to have a hell of a time getting past your prose."
gaaaaah.
In the optimized university the role of the faculty will be as “educational designers,” utilizing their knowledge of the discipline and how best to learn that discipline to design optimized educational environments, activities, and assessment. Within those environments, students will have the role of effortful constructors of their understanding.
As soon as I saw the phrases "educational designers" and--even better!--"effortful constructors", I thought to myself, "You know, there may actually be some good ideas in here, but they're going to have a hell of a time getting past your prose."
gaaaaah.
(no subject)
Date: 18 August 2008 17:19 (UTC)But yeah, there's LOTS of bizarre language in education. Put that together with administrators (who use language like businessmen) and it gets REALLY messed up.
(no subject)
Date: 18 August 2008 17:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 August 2008 17:58 (UTC)I note with some cynicism that the paragraph I quoted appears to imply that the professor will design everything about a student's educational experience. However, university professors are not (in the context of research universities, at least) selected for their ability as teachers (or their knowledge of educational best practices), but for their specialized domain knowledge in their specific fields.
And yes, there's bizarre language in the education field. This is probably for the same reason that there's a lot of bizarre language in the military, i.e., lots of close interaction with government (and thus legalese) at various levels.