jrtom: (execute)
[personal profile] jrtom
My sister ([livejournal.com profile] red_frog) quoth:

I want you to play this for your lovely wife and tell me if this reminds her of what it would sound like if we kept you up for five days straight, fed you doughnuts, and then demanded that you cover the original. (Anyone reading this who knows what his singing voice sounds like is welcome to weigh in as well. Me, I'm thinking it's not a perfect match, but he leapt immediately to mind when I heard it.)


The year before last, I sang with the UC Irvine men's group called Men In Blaque. (I'm not responsible for the spelling of the name; apparently they were worried about trademark infringements and no one told them that the phrase seriously predated the movie. Me, I would have gone with Menne In Blak.) They perform music that, as I put it, runs the gamut from the sublime (Gregorian chants and all that) to the ridiculous (you guessed it). It's actually a very highly skilled and talented group of folks (generally speaking) but the director drives me nuts (much like the steering wheel in my pants), which is one reason I'm not still singing with them. On the plus side, I did get to tour Mexico (Puebla) with them and find out that my Spanish is marginally better when I'm drunk. But I digress...

The director selected me, without bothering to audition anyone, as the soloist for this piece. In this case, that meant that I did the spoken parts (as well as singing the baritone part with the ensemble), and the choreography was centered around me. (It also, for some of our concerts, involved members of the choir creeping around the audience and temporarily kidnapping small children. I am not making this up.) The musical arrangement was fairly conventional (not jazzed up as this one is) but, alas, truncated: it's missing at least one verse, possibly two.

I asked the director later and he told me that in addition to the good fit for the voice, he thought I resembled Jim Carrey. (He assured me that he meant this in a good way.) I conclude that he was basing this mostly on the dark hair, the propensity for wisecracks, the height, and the rubber face (I'm convinced, given their heritage, that my offspring are going to have Eyes As Large As Saucers and the ability to rotate their faces completely around their skulls), rather than on any actual similarity of facial features. I must admit that I enjoyed displaying what I thought was the appropriate expression for having just eaten a sandwich involving arsenic sauce.

I actually thought the rendition above was pretty funny. However, I don't think that I can reliably sing quite as low as that even when I've been up for 5 days (which doesn't necessarily help anyway). Some post-processing might help.

Updates: I'm now hosting that song myself (*paints target on chest labeled 'RIAA: SHOOT ME'*), so it should be (a) less ephemeral and (b) more easily reachable. I've also listened to the song a couple more times, and I suspect that there is actually some processing going on there--not that I haven't met a few people that could sing that low.

(no subject)

Date: 4 December 2004 21:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hypgnosis.livejournal.com
I have to agree with [livejournal.com profile] jrtom on the first one --- I know at least two men far hairier than I. I also cannot be the God of Sarcasm --- [livejournal.com profile] naudiz allows no challengers for her title.

While I do admit to some moments of tasteless humor, and *braaaaapp* the occasional belch, and a dose of packrattitude, if I were really to aspire to the Godhood of something . . .

. . . I'd like it to be the God of Analogies. I love finding them, constructing them, analyzing them and their close relatives called homomorphisms, telling stories using them, and unearthing the roots of them (esp. when the analogies are in the form of wacky idiomatic expressions -- then I'm happy as a pig in Congress). Plus, analogies are a major coin of the realm when you're teaching.

(no subject)

Date: 5 December 2004 20:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrtom.livejournal.com
What--no isomorphisms? Diffeomorphisms? ("Complete the isomorphism [and this sentence], ...") :>

I'd like to put in a bid for being the God of either Devil's Advocacy (ah, the irony...) or Casuistry. ;>

(no subject)

Date: 10 November 2005 22:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hypgnosis.livejournal.com
From the Tying Up Ancient Loose Ends Dept. (whom we hardly ever hear from because they're sooooo backlogged):

1) As I know I mentioned to you on the phone after this post, isomorphisms and diffeomorphisms are both types of homomorphisms, and thus are already covered.

2) I am not sure that you want to be the God of Casuistry, given these definitions. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 11 November 2005 08:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrtom.livejournal.com
OK, we'll go with "Hairsplitting Arguments" rather than "Casuistry"...although some of those definitions are not far off in spirit. ;) (Brought to you by the author of the proof that halitosis has been responsible for many technological advancements.)

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 30 December 2025 06:06
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios