courtesy (if that's the word) of
So does making a filkish sort of reference in the subject line make me (a) more nerdy, (b) less nerdy, (c) just as nerdy but in a dimension unmeasured by the test, (d) chainsaw, (e) my [INSERT DEITY HERE], man, you're making a post that has a multiple-choice question in it--how much more nerdy can you get?--and let's not even address the fact that you're up to (e) with no sign of stopping, and plenty of signs of additional parenthetical or otherwise subordinated (or at least cowed) clauses coming up, (f) go back to work, lame-o, (g) a useful ally, (h) a snappy dresser, or (i) cute on the end of a spear?
jesus christ
Date: 6 January 2005 17:53 (UTC)quinn
Re: jesus christ
Date: 6 January 2005 18:16 (UTC)Anyway, I, for one, welcome you as my new geek dictator. ;>
you win
Date: 7 January 2005 23:25 (UTC)...or rather, quinn wins. but then, who's competing...?
Re: you win
Date: 9 January 2005 19:58 (UTC)I'm just thankful I'm more well-adjusted than the rest of y'all.
(amnesiadust excepted, or course)
-JKL
p.s. thank God they didn't ask about the oscilloscope.
(no subject)
Date: 11 January 2005 00:55 (UTC)Second, what really makes you more nerdy is that your multiple-choice question quotes from two other multiple-choice tests, one of which came from Dragon magazine.
OTOH, I am the one who told you about that Dragon magazine test, so it's little surprise that my own nerdiness score is 92.