huh?

20 May 2005 17:13
jrtom: (Default)
[personal profile] jrtom
Washington Post: Poll: Senate Should Examine Federal Judges

There are two poll results quoted here that particularly puzzle me in combination:

More than three-quarters of Americans say the Senate should aggressively examine federal judicial nominees and not just approve them because they are the president's choices.

...

A slim majority--52 percent--say they would be comfortable with whomever President Bush might pick for the Supreme Court.


I'm tempted to interpret this as "the Senate ought to be conscientious, but I can't be bothered to be 'cause it's not my job". Possibly it's a general-vs.-specific thing ("in general I think that the Senate ought to, but in particular I think Bush's picks are likely to be OK"). Which causes me to wonder if all sitting Presidents get this sort of vote of confidence boost in this regard.

Anyway: weird.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 29 December 2025 23:46
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios