jrtom: (Default)
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/08/why-no-i-am-not-one.html

I'm not entirely clear on how the 'distributed' element comes into play so far as flight is concerned, but the concept is pretty cool.
jrtom: (Default)
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/why_were_not_obsolete/

References an article in Science to which I don't have access, sadly, but here's the abstract:

For centuries, scientists have attempted to identify and document analytical laws that underlie physical phenomena in nature. Despite the prevalence of computing power, the process of finding natural laws and their corresponding equations has resisted automation. A key challenge to finding analytic relations automatically is defining algorithmically what makes a correlation in observed data important and insightful. We propose a principle for the identification of nontriviality. We demonstrated this approach by automatically searching motion-tracking data captured from various physical systems, ranging from simple harmonic oscillators to chaotic double-pendula. Without any prior knowledge about physics, kinematics, or geometry, the algorithm discovered Hamiltonians, Lagrangians, and other laws of geometric and momentum conservation. The discovery rate accelerated as laws found for simpler systems were used to bootstrap explanations for more complex systems, gradually uncovering the "alphabet" used to describe those systems.


It will be interesting to see how well this sort of thing does outside of the original domain.
jrtom: (Default)
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/01/07/dod-wants-parent-bot.html

"Idea OSD09-H03? Develop an AI that fools young children into thinking they are talking to Daddy or Mommy when Daddy or Mommy are off on their 3rd deployment to Iraq and can't come to the webcam."

The child should be able to have a simulated conversation with a parent about generic, everyday topics. For instance, a child may get a response from saying "I love you", or "I miss you", or "Good night mommy/daddy." ... The application should incorporate an AI that allows for flexibility in language comprehension to give the illusion of a natural (but simple) interaction."


What are the odds that this system would end up interacting with a kid after their parent's been killed or severely wounded? (Especially given the assumption that the parent can't come to the phone/webcam?)

(Personally, I'm betting that it turns out to be pretty hard to fool even a three-year-old into thinking that they're talking to their own parent. This is, IMO, arguably _harder_ than a Turing Test--you have to convince the kid that they are talking to a _specific_ person rather than a computer composite of previous recordings.)

gah.
jrtom: (Default)
http://www.singinst.org/media

Has talks by several well-known people in this and related areas (Kurzweil, Hofstadter, Drexler, etc.) plus panel discussions; I'm looking forward to checking them out.

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 1 July 2025 15:32
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios