WW II: realistic?
12 July 2010 10:15Maybe not:
http://squid314.livejournal.com/275614.html
A very funny "review" of World War II which emphasizes the repeated failures of realism from a narrative standpoint. E.g.:
http://squid314.livejournal.com/275614.html
A very funny "review" of World War II which emphasizes the repeated failures of realism from a narrative standpoint. E.g.:
Not that the good guys are much better. Their leader, Churchill, appeared in a grand total of one episode before, where he was a bumbling general who suffered an embarrassing defeat to the Ottomans of all people in the Battle of Gallipoli. Now, all of a sudden, he's not only Prime Minister, he's not only a brilliant military commander, he's not only the greatest orator of the twentieth century who can convince the British to keep going against all odds, he's also a natural wit who is able to pull out hilarious one-liners practically on demand. I know he's supposed to be the hero, but it's not realistic unless you keep the guy at least vaguely human.