http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/health/18huntington.html?ex=1331870400&en=7ce9d3291eab0b28&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Personally, I think I'd rather know.
But it's a hard thing to know.
Personally, I think I'd rather know.
But it's a hard thing to know.
I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 17:43 (UTC)But yeah, that's a hard thing to know.
Re: I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 17:45 (UTC)I've got a pair of friends who "screen" positive for Downs syndrome on their current pregnancy, based purely on family history and age. They're deciding whether to get the genetic test. Hard stuff.
Re: I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 17:53 (UTC)(Yes, you do this every time you decide to adopt a pet, or have/adopt an infant. But it feels different, somehow.)
Re: I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 17:51 (UTC)For a darker example, let's suppose that [INSERT DEITY HERE] handed you a note in an envelope labeled "date of your death".
Would you open it?
Re: I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 17:53 (UTC)Yep. I'd open it in a heartbeat.
Then again, I've recently had occasion to learn that I'm not the sort who crumbles when confronted with death.
Re: I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 19:00 (UTC)I think I might well be happier if I didn't open it.
There is no force on earth that could keep me from opening it.
If only because billions of people don't know what the date of their death will be, and I would be the only one, and I have an absolute belief in the value of the unique. I'd like to see what difference it would make.
Re: I'd want to know.
Date: 19 March 2007 19:42 (UTC)No, I would not. Sure, I'd be tempted, but I'm quite sure I wouldn't.
(no subject)
Date: 19 March 2007 19:03 (UTC)