jrtom: (Default)
[personal profile] jrtom
http://www.juxtapoz.com/jux/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1121&Itemid=50

This is truly fascinating, in the original sense of the word: it's hard to take your eyes off it. (And has a nicely complementary solo cello soundtrack.)

If I had more familiarity with art in general, I'd get all geeky about that aspect of it, but as it is I can't even guarantee that the creator of the video used paintings in chronological order (although I do recognize many of them, and I did notice a couple of obvious stylistic shifts, e.g., impressionism and modernism). Technically, though, the morphing was very nicely done.

One random observation: the morphing, which gives the impression of the face turning back and forth, reminds me of how uncomfortable some of those poses must have been for the model. :P

(no subject)

Date: 1 June 2007 00:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kightp.livejournal.com
Wow.

I've had just enough art history to say that yes, I think it's roughly chronological, and just enough feminist theory to be stunned at how little difference there's been in the concept of feminine beauty, at least in European culture, over five centuries.

(no subject)

Date: 1 June 2007 03:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyd.livejournal.com
There would be a lot more variance if you could see the bodies.

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 29 December 2025 11:10
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios