jrtom: (Default)
http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/06/12/2213233.shtml

I haven't read the paper yet...but I suspect that this is one of those cases in which the process of building a model obscures the fact that the inputs and objective functions are not well-defined.

Nevertheless I plan on checking this out at some point.
jrtom: (safe cat)
http://www.netflixprize.com/

I so don't have time for this right now, but it sounds like a really interesting problem. Not sure I'm eligible to participate (my PhD advisor is apparently one of the judges, which I think explains a conversation that I had with him a couple of weeks ago involving a lot of intentional vagueness on his part), anyway, but I bet that I could do a pretty decent job if I had the time to sink into it. (Especially considering the data that they have but are not using...)

argh.

Profile

jrtom: (Default)
jrtom

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 27 December 2025 22:30
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios